Skip to content

Apple MacBook Neo vs ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED (UM5606)

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Apple MacBook Neo

13" · 2408×1506 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →

ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED (UM5606)

16" · 2880×1800 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 41cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Apple MacBook Neo 2026 ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED (UM5606) 2024
Screen Size 13" 16" (Better)
Resolution 2408×1506 2880×1800 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 219 (Better) 212
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm (Better) 41cm
Panel Type IPS OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:10 16:10
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None None
Response Time 25 ms GTG 0.2 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR True Black 500
SDR Brightness 500 nits (Better) 400 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 500 nits 500 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,200 1:1,000,000 (Better)
Ports 0x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C
USB-C Power Delivery 30 W 65 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 100% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 94%
Year 2026 (Better) 2024

Summary

The Apple MacBook Neo has higher pixel density (219 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Apple MacBook Neo allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED (UM5606) offers a larger 16" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Apple MacBook Neo or ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED (UM5606)?
The Apple MacBook Neo has 219 PPI compared to 212 PPI for the ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED (UM5606).
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Apple MacBook Neo requires 40cm vs 41cm for the ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED (UM5606) to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons