Skip to content

Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345) vs HP Omen Transcend 14

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345)

13.4" · 2880×1800 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 35cm
Open in calculator →

HP Omen Transcend 14

14" · 2880×1800 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 36cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345) 2024 HP Omen Transcend 14 2025
Screen Size 13.4" 14" (Better)
Resolution 2880×1800 2880×1800
Pixel Density (PPI) 254 (Better) 243
Optimal Viewing Distance 35cm (Better) 36cm
Panel Type OLED OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:10 16:10
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None None
Response Time 0.2 ms GTG 0.2 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 500 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 400 nits (Better) 390 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 500 nits 600 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 1:1,000,000
Ports 0x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C
USB-C Power Delivery 130 W (Better) 100 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 95% sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 97% (Better)
Year 2024 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345) has higher pixel density (254 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345) allows sitting closer (35cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The HP Omen Transcend 14 offers a larger 14" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345) or HP Omen Transcend 14?
The Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345) has 254 PPI compared to 243 PPI for the HP Omen Transcend 14.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Dell XPS 13 OLED (9345) requires 35cm vs 36cm for the HP Omen Transcend 14 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons