Skip to content

HP Omen Transcend 14 vs Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

HP Omen Transcend 14

14" · 2880×1800 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 36cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16"

16" · 2880×1800 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 41cm
Open in calculator →
Specification HP Omen Transcend 14 2025 Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" 2025
Screen Size 14" 16" (Better)
Resolution 2880×1800 2880×1800
Pixel Density (PPI) 243 (Better) 212
Optimal Viewing Distance 36cm (Better) 41cm
Panel Type OLED OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:10 16:10
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None None
Response Time 0.2 ms GTG (Better) 3 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR True Black 500
SDR Brightness 390 nits 390 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 600 nits (Better) 570 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 1:1,000,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C
USB-C Power Delivery 100 W (Better) 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 97% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 96%
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The HP Omen Transcend 14 has higher pixel density (243 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The HP Omen Transcend 14 allows sitting closer (36cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" offers a larger 16" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: HP Omen Transcend 14 or Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16"?
The HP Omen Transcend 14 has 243 PPI compared to 212 PPI for the Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The HP Omen Transcend 14 requires 36cm vs 41cm for the Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons