Skip to content

Alienware AW2725DF 27" vs Huawei MateView

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Alienware AW2725DF 27"

26.7" · 2560×1440 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView

28.2" · 3840×2560 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 Huawei MateView 2021
Screen Size 26.7" 28.2" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 3840×2560 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 110 164 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm 53cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 3:2
Refresh Rate 360 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 8 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 250 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:1,200
Ports 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 93%
Year 2024 (Better) 2021

Summary

The Huawei MateView has higher pixel density (164 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Huawei MateView allows sitting closer (53cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Huawei MateView offers a larger 28.2" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Alienware AW2725DF 27" or Huawei MateView?
The Huawei MateView has 164 PPI compared to 110 PPI for the Alienware AW2725DF 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Huawei MateView requires 53cm vs 79cm for the Alienware AW2725DF 27" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons