Skip to content

Alienware AW2725DF 27" vs Huawei MateView GT 34

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Alienware AW2725DF 27"

26.7" · 2560×1440 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView GT 34

34" · 3440×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 Huawei MateView GT 34 2021
Screen Size 26.7" 34" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 3440×1440 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 110 (Better) 110
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm (Better) 80cm
Panel Type QD-OLED VA
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 21:9
Refresh Rate 360 Hz (Better) 165 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 4 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 None
SDR Brightness 250 nits 350 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:4,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 85%
Year 2024 (Better) 2021

Summary

The Alienware AW2725DF 27" has higher pixel density (110 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Alienware AW2725DF 27" allows sitting closer (79cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Huawei MateView GT 34 offers a larger 34" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Alienware AW2725DF 27" or Huawei MateView GT 34?
The Alienware AW2725DF 27" has 110 PPI compared to 110 PPI for the Huawei MateView GT 34.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Alienware AW2725DF 27" requires 79cm vs 80cm for the Huawei MateView GT 34 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons