Skip to content

Alienware AW3225QF 32" vs Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Alienware AW3225QF 32"

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K 2023
Screen Size 31.6" (Better) 27"
Resolution 3840×2160 5120×2880 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 139 218 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC Compatible None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 None
SDR Brightness 260 nits 600 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 0x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 97% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94%
Year 2024 (Better) 2023

Summary

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Alienware AW3225QF 32" offers a larger 31.6" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Alienware AW3225QF 32" or Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has 218 PPI compared to 139 PPI for the Alienware AW3225QF 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K requires 40cm vs 63cm for the Alienware AW3225QF 32" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons