Apple Pro Display XDR 32" vs BenQ MA270UP
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Advantages of Apple Pro Display XDR 32"
| Specification | Apple Pro Display XDR 32" | BenQ MA270UP |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 32" | 27" |
| Resolution | 6016×3384 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 216 | 163 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 41cm | 54cm |
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1600 nits | 450 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 | 1:1,200 |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W | 90 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% |
Advantages of BenQ MA270UP
| Specification | Apple Pro Display XDR 32" | BenQ MA270UP |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2019 | 2025 |
Identical
| Specification | Apple Pro Display XDR 32" | BenQ MA270UP |
|---|---|---|
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | None |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Ports | USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub |
Summary
Sharpness: no visible difference
Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 65cm. The Apple Pro Display XDR 32" has 32% higher pixel density (216 vs 163 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 41cm.
Brightness: advantage Apple Pro Display XDR 32"
Similar SDR brightness (500 vs 450 nits), but the Apple Pro Display XDR 32" leads in HDR peak (1600 vs 450 nits).
All specifications
| Specification | Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 | BenQ MA270UP 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 32" (Better) | 27" |
| Resolution | 6016×3384 (Better) | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 216 (Better) | 163 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 41cm (Better) | 54cm |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | None |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits (Better) | 450 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1600 nits (Better) | 450 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 (Better) | 1:1,200 |
| Ports | USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W (Better) | 90 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% (Better) | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% |
| Year | 2019 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Apple Pro Display XDR 32" or BenQ MA270UP?
The Apple Pro Display XDR 32" has 216 PPI compared to 163 PPI for the BenQ MA270UP.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Apple Pro Display XDR 32" requires 41cm vs 54cm for the BenQ MA270UP to reach retina quality.
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated:
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 · 216 PPI · 32" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ MA270UP 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 · 216 PPI · 32" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ MA270UP 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz