Skip to content

Apple Pro Display XDR 32" vs Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Apple Pro Display XDR 32"

32" · 6016×3384 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 41cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K 2023
Screen Size 32" (Better) 27"
Resolution 6016×3384 (Better) 5120×2880
Pixel Density (PPI) 216 218 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 41cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None None
Response Time 5 ms GTG 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 500 nits 600 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1600 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 0x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 0x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 96 W (Better) 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94%
Year 2019 2023 (Better)

Summary

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Apple Pro Display XDR 32" offers a larger 32" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Apple Pro Display XDR 32" or Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has 218 PPI compared to 216 PPI for the Apple Pro Display XDR 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K requires 40cm vs 41cm for the Apple Pro Display XDR 32" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons