Skip to content

Apple Studio Display XDR 27" vs ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Apple Studio Display XDR 27"

27" · 5120×2880 · Mini-LED
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →

ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27"

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Apple Studio Display XDR 27" 2026 ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" 2023
Screen Size 27" 27"
Resolution 5120×2880 (Better) 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 218 (Better) 163
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm (Better) 54cm
Panel Type Mini-LED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 120 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync None
Response Time 5 ms GTG 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 350 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 2000 nits (Better) 400 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 0x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 2x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 140 W (Better) 96 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 98% sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 99% (Better)
Year 2026 (Better) 2023

Summary

The Apple Studio Display XDR 27" has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Apple Studio Display XDR 27" allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Apple Studio Display XDR 27" or ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27"?
The Apple Studio Display XDR 27" has 218 PPI compared to 163 PPI for the ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Apple Studio Display XDR 27" requires 40cm vs 54cm for the ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons