Skip to content

ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" vs Dell S3225QC

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27"

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →

Dell S3225QC

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" 2023 Dell S3225QC 2025
Screen Size 27" 31.6" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 163 (Better) 139
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm (Better) 63cm
Panel Type IPS QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None FreeSync Premium
Response Time 5 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 350 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits 1000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 2x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 96 W (Better) 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 99% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95%
Year 2023 2025 (Better)

Summary

The ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" has higher pixel density (163 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" allows sitting closer (54cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Dell S3225QC offers a larger 31.6" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" or Dell S3225QC?
The ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" has 163 PPI compared to 139 PPI for the Dell S3225QC.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The ASUS ProArt PA279CRV 27" requires 54cm vs 63cm for the Dell S3225QC to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons