Skip to content

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" vs ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34"

34" · 3440×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5" · 2560×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" 2022 ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022
Screen Size 34" (Better) 29.5"
Resolution 3440×1440 (Better) 2560×1080
Pixel Density (PPI) 110 (Better) 94
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm (Better) 93cm
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 21:9
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 220 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium
Response Time 2 ms GTG 1 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 None
SDR Brightness 350 nits (Better) 300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits (Better) 300 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W (Better) 15 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 100% sRGB 110% (Better)
Year 2022 2022

Summary

The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" has higher pixel density (110 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" allows sitting closer (80cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" offers a larger 34" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" or ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM?
The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" has 110 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" requires 80cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons