Skip to content

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" vs Dell S3225QC

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34"

34" · 3440×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →

Dell S3225QC

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" 2022 Dell S3225QC 2025
Screen Size 34" (Better) 31.6"
Resolution 3440×1440 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 110 139 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm 63cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium
Response Time 2 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 350 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits 1000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 100% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95%
Year 2022 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Dell S3225QC has higher pixel density (139 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Dell S3225QC allows sitting closer (63cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" offers a larger 34" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" or Dell S3225QC?
The Dell S3225QC has 139 PPI compared to 110 PPI for the ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Dell S3225QC requires 63cm vs 80cm for the ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons