Skip to content

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" vs Huawei MateView

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34"

34" · 3440×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView

28.2" · 3840×2560 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" 2022 Huawei MateView 2021
Screen Size 34" (Better) 28.2"
Resolution 3440×1440 3840×2560 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 110 164 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm 53cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 3:2
Refresh Rate 120 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro None
Response Time 2 ms GTG (Better) 8 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 350 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits 600 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,200 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W (Better) 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 100% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 93%
Year 2022 (Better) 2021

Summary

The Huawei MateView has higher pixel density (164 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Huawei MateView allows sitting closer (53cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" offers a larger 34" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" or Huawei MateView?
The Huawei MateView has 164 PPI compared to 110 PPI for the ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Huawei MateView requires 53cm vs 80cm for the ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons