Skip to content

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34"

34" · 3440×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →

MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" 2022 MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024
Screen Size 34" (Better) 31.5"
Resolution 3440×1440 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 110 140 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm 62cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 240 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 2 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 350 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits 1000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 100% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96%
Year 2022 2024 (Better)

Summary

The MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" has higher pixel density (140 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" allows sitting closer (62cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" offers a larger 34" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" or MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"?
The MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" has 140 PPI compared to 110 PPI for the ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" requires 62cm vs 80cm for the ASUS ProArt PA348CGV 34" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons