Skip to content

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5" · 2560×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm
Open in calculator →

LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

31.5" · 3840×2160 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 LG UltraGear 32GS95UE 2024
Screen Size 29.5" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1080 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 94 140 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm 62cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 220 Hz 240 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 1 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 300 nits (Better) 275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 300 nits 731 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 15 W
Color Gamut sRGB 110% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 88%
Year 2022 2024 (Better)

Summary

The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE has higher pixel density (140 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE allows sitting closer (62cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or LG UltraGear 32GS95UE?
The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE has 140 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE requires 62cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons