Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" vs BenQ MA270UP

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27"

26.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →

BenQ MA270UP

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" 2025 BenQ MA270UP 2025
Screen Size 26.5" 27" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 166 (Better) 163
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm (Better) 54cm
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 250 nits 450 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 450 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:1,200
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 145% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94% (Better) sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95%
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" has higher pixel density (166 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" allows sitting closer (53cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The BenQ MA270UP offers a larger 27" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" or BenQ MA270UP?
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" has 166 PPI compared to 163 PPI for the BenQ MA270UP.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" requires 53cm vs 54cm for the BenQ MA270UP to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons