Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" vs Kuycon G32P

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27"

26.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →

Kuycon G32P

31.5" · 6144×3456 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 39cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" 2025 Kuycon G32P 2025
Screen Size 26.5" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2160 6144×3456 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 166 224 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm 39cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 None
SDR Brightness 250 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 500 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:2,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 100 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 145% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94% (Better) sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99%
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The Kuycon G32P has higher pixel density (224 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Kuycon G32P allows sitting closer (39cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Kuycon G32P offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" or Kuycon G32P?
The Kuycon G32P has 224 PPI compared to 166 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon G32P requires 39cm vs 53cm for the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons