Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" vs BenQ PD2725U 27"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27"

26.5" · 2560×1440 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm
Open in calculator →

BenQ PD2725U 27"

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" 2024 BenQ PD2725U 27" 2021
Screen Size 26.5" 27" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 111 163 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm 54cm (Better)
Panel Type OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 480 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 250 nits 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1300 nits (Better) 400 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:1,200
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 135% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 100%
Year 2024 (Better) 2021

Summary

The BenQ PD2725U 27" has higher pixel density (163 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The BenQ PD2725U 27" allows sitting closer (54cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The BenQ PD2725U 27" offers a larger 27" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" or BenQ PD2725U 27"?
The BenQ PD2725U 27" has 163 PPI compared to 111 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The BenQ PD2725U 27" requires 54cm vs 79cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons