Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" vs Dell S3225QC

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27"

26.5" · 2560×1440 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm
Open in calculator →

Dell S3225QC

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" 2024 Dell S3225QC 2025
Screen Size 26.5" 31.6" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 111 139 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm 63cm (Better)
Panel Type OLED QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 480 Hz (Better) 120 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync Premium
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 250 nits 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1300 nits (Better) 1000 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 1:1,500,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 135% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95%
Year 2024 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Dell S3225QC has higher pixel density (139 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Dell S3225QC allows sitting closer (63cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Dell S3225QC offers a larger 31.6" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" or Dell S3225QC?
The Dell S3225QC has 139 PPI compared to 111 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Dell S3225QC requires 63cm vs 79cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons