Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" vs Huawei MateView GT 27

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27"

26.5" · 2560×1440 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView GT 27

27" · 2560×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" 2024 Huawei MateView GT 27 2022
Screen Size 26.5" 27" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 2560×1440
Pixel Density (PPI) 111 (Better) 109
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm (Better) 80cm
Panel Type OLED VA
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 480 Hz (Better) 165 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync Premium
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 4 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 None
SDR Brightness 250 nits 350 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1300 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:4,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP
Color Gamut sRGB 135% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 85%
Year 2024 (Better) 2022

Summary

The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" has higher pixel density (111 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" allows sitting closer (79cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Huawei MateView GT 27 offers a larger 27" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" or Huawei MateView GT 27?
The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" has 111 PPI compared to 109 PPI for the Huawei MateView GT 27.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" requires 79cm vs 80cm for the Huawei MateView GT 27 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons