Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" vs LG 32UN880-B 32"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27"

26.5" · 2560×1440 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm
Open in calculator →

LG 32UN880-B 32"

31.5" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" 2024 LG 32UN880-B 32" 2020
Screen Size 26.5" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 111 140 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 79cm 62cm (Better)
Panel Type OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 480 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 None
SDR Brightness 250 nits 350 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1300 nits (Better) 450 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 60 W
Color Gamut sRGB 135% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 87%
Year 2024 (Better) 2020

Summary

The LG 32UN880-B 32" has higher pixel density (140 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The LG 32UN880-B 32" allows sitting closer (62cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The LG 32UN880-B 32" offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" or LG 32UN880-B 32"?
The LG 32UN880-B 32" has 140 PPI compared to 111 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The LG 32UN880-B 32" requires 62cm vs 79cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons