Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 vs Kuycon G32X

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

Kuycon G32X

31.5" · 6016×3384 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 Kuycon G32X 2025
Screen Size 31.5" 31.5"
Resolution 3840×2160 6016×3384 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 219 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro G-SYNC Compatible
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 500 None
SDR Brightness 300 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 500 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:1,500
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 100 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 98%
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The Kuycon G32X has higher pixel density (219 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Kuycon G32X allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 or Kuycon G32X?
The Kuycon G32X has 219 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon G32X requires 40cm vs 62cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons