ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 vs Kuycon P27D
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3
31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Advantages of ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 | Kuycon P27D |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" | 27" |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits | 500 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 | 1:1,000 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% | sRGB 99% |
Advantages of Kuycon P27D
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 | Kuycon P27D |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 140 | 163 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 62cm | 54cm |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W |
Identical
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 | Kuycon P27D |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-SYNC Compatible |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 500 | None |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Summary
Sharpness: no visible difference
Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 65cm. The Kuycon P27D has 14% higher pixel density (163 vs 140 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 54cm.
Brightness: advantage Kuycon P27D
The Kuycon P27D is 67% brighter in SDR (500 vs 300 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 500 vs 1000 nits.
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 | Kuycon P27D 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" (Better) | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 140 | 163 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 62cm | 54cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz (Better) | 144 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 500 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits (Better) | 500 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 (Better) | 1:1,000 |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) | sRGB 99% |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 or Kuycon P27D?
The Kuycon P27D has 163 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon P27D requires 54cm vs 62cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 to reach retina quality.
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated:
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon P27D 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 144 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon P27D 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 144 Hz