Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 vs LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S

31.5" · 6144×3456 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 39cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S 2025
Screen Size 31.5" 31.5"
Resolution 3840×2160 6144×3456 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 224 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm 39cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 500 DisplayHDR 600
SDR Brightness 300 nits 450 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:2,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 96 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 99.5%
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S has higher pixel density (224 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S allows sitting closer (39cm) while maintaining retina quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 or LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S?
The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S has 224 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S requires 39cm vs 62cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons