Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024
Screen Size 31.5" 31.5"
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 140
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm 62cm
Panel Type QD-OLED QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz 240 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 500 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 300 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 1:1,500,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96%
Year 2025 (Better) 2024

Summary

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 or MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"?
Both have 140 PPI.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 62cm for retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons