Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" vs Dell S3225QC

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42"

41.5" · 3840×2160 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 82cm
Open in calculator →

Dell S3225QC

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" 2022 Dell S3225QC 2025
Screen Size 41.5" (Better) 31.6"
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 106 139 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 82cm 63cm (Better)
Panel Type OLED QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 138 Hz (Better) 120 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC Compatible FreeSync Premium
Response Time 0.1 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 450 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 4x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 133% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 94% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95%
Year 2022 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Dell S3225QC has higher pixel density (139 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Dell S3225QC allows sitting closer (63cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" offers a larger 41.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" or Dell S3225QC?
The Dell S3225QC has 139 PPI compared to 106 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Dell S3225QC requires 63cm vs 82cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons