Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" vs Huawei MateView GT 34

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42"

41.5" · 3840×2160 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 82cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView GT 34

34" · 3440×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" 2022 Huawei MateView GT 34 2021
Screen Size 41.5" (Better) 34"
Resolution 3840×2160 (Better) 3440×1440
Pixel Density (PPI) 106 110 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 82cm 80cm (Better)
Panel Type OLED VA
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 21:9
Refresh Rate 138 Hz 165 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC Compatible FreeSync Premium
Response Time 0.1 ms GTG (Better) 4 ms GTG
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 450 nits (Better) 350 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:4,000
Ports 4x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP
Color Gamut sRGB 133% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 94% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 85%
Year 2022 (Better) 2021

Summary

The Huawei MateView GT 34 has higher pixel density (110 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Huawei MateView GT 34 allows sitting closer (80cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" offers a larger 41.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" or Huawei MateView GT 34?
The Huawei MateView GT 34 has 110 PPI compared to 106 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Huawei MateView GT 34 requires 80cm vs 82cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons