Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" vs Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42"

41.5" · 3840×2160 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 82cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD

27" · 2560×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" 2022 Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD 2024
Screen Size 41.5" (Better) 27"
Resolution 3840×2160 (Better) 2560×1440
Pixel Density (PPI) 106 109 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 82cm 80cm (Better)
Panel Type OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 138 Hz (Better) 100 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC Compatible None
Response Time 0.1 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 450 nits (Better) 300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 4x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP
Color Gamut sRGB 133% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 94% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 95%
Year 2022 2024 (Better)

Summary

The Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD has higher pixel density (109 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD allows sitting closer (80cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" offers a larger 41.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" or Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD?
The Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD has 109 PPI compared to 106 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD requires 80cm vs 82cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ 42" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons