Skip to content

BenQ MA270UP vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

BenQ MA270UP

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →

MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Specification BenQ MA270UP 2025 MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024
Screen Size 27" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 163 (Better) 140
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm (Better) 62cm
Panel Type IPS QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 240 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 5 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 450 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 450 nits 1000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,200 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better)
Year 2025 (Better) 2024

Summary

The BenQ MA270UP has higher pixel density (163 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The BenQ MA270UP allows sitting closer (54cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: BenQ MA270UP or MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"?
The BenQ MA270UP has 163 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The BenQ MA270UP requires 54cm vs 62cm for the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons