BenQ PD2725U 27" vs Kuycon G32X
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Advantages of Kuycon G32X
| Specification | BenQ PD2725U 27" | Kuycon G32X |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 6016×3384 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 163 | 219 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 54cm | 40cm |
| SDR Brightness | 250 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,200 | 1:1,500 |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 65 W | 100 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 100% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 98% |
| Year | 2021 | 2025 |
Identical
| Specification | BenQ PD2725U 27" | Kuycon G32X |
|---|---|---|
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 400 | None |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
Summary
Sharpness: no visible difference
Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 65cm. The Kuycon G32X has 26% higher pixel density (219 vs 163 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 40cm.
Brightness: advantage Kuycon G32X
The Kuycon G32X is 100% brighter in SDR (500 vs 250 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 500 vs 400 nits.
All specifications
| Specification | BenQ PD2725U 27" 2021 | Kuycon G32X 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 31.5" (Better) |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 6016×3384 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 163 | 219 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 54cm | 40cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 400 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 250 nits | 500 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,200 | 1:1,500 (Better) |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 65 W | 100 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 100% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 98% (Better) |
| Year | 2021 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: BenQ PD2725U 27" or Kuycon G32X?
The Kuycon G32X has 219 PPI compared to 163 PPI for the BenQ PD2725U 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon G32X requires 40cm vs 54cm for the BenQ PD2725U 27" to reach retina quality.
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated:
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ PD2725U 27" 2021 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon G32X 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ PD2725U 27" 2021 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon G32X 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz