Skip to content

BenQ RD280U vs Kuycon G32P

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

BenQ RD280U

28.2" · 3840×2560 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →

Kuycon G32P

31.5" · 6144×3456 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 39cm
Open in calculator →
Specification BenQ RD280U 2024 Kuycon G32P 2025
Screen Size 28.2" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2560 6144×3456 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 164 224 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm 39cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 3:2 16:9
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None FreeSync
Response Time 5 ms GTG 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 None
SDR Brightness 350 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits 500 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,200 1:2,000 (Better)
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 100 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 93% · Adobe RGB 87% sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% (Better)
Year 2024 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Kuycon G32P has higher pixel density (224 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Kuycon G32P allows sitting closer (39cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Kuycon G32P offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: BenQ RD280U or Kuycon G32P?
The Kuycon G32P has 224 PPI compared to 164 PPI for the BenQ RD280U.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon G32P requires 39cm vs 53cm for the BenQ RD280U to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons