Dell S3225QC vs Kuycon P32K
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Advantages of Dell S3225QC
| Specification | Dell S3225QC | Kuycon P32K |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.6" | 31.5" |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits | 500 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 | 1:1,000 |
Advantages of Kuycon P32K
| Specification | Dell S3225QC | Kuycon P32K |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 139 | 140 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 63cm | 62cm |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| SDR Brightness | 250 nits | 500 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% | sRGB 99% |
Identical
| Specification | Dell S3225QC | Kuycon P32K |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium | G-SYNC Compatible |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | None |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Summary
Sharpness: identical
Both screens are retina at 65cm. With nearly identical pixel density (139 vs 140 PPI), there is no visible difference in sharpness.
Brightness: advantage Kuycon P32K
The Kuycon P32K is 100% brighter in SDR (500 vs 250 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 500 vs 1000 nits.
All specifications
| Specification | Dell S3225QC 2025 | Kuycon P32K 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.6" (Better) | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 139 | 140 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 63cm | 62cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 250 nits | 500 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits (Better) | 500 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 (Better) | 1:1,000 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% | sRGB 99% (Better) |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Dell S3225QC or Kuycon P32K?
The Kuycon P32K has 140 PPI compared to 139 PPI for the Dell S3225QC.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon P32K requires 62cm vs 63cm for the Dell S3225QC to reach retina quality.
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated:
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Dell S3225QC 2025 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 120 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon P32K 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 144 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Dell S3225QC 2025 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 120 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon P32K 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 144 Hz