Skip to content

Dell S3225QC vs Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Dell S3225QC

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Dell S3225QC 2025 Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K 2023
Screen Size 31.6" (Better) 27"
Resolution 3840×2160 5120×2880 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 139 218 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 120 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 None
SDR Brightness 250 nits 600 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 0x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94%
Year 2025 (Better) 2023

Summary

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Dell S3225QC offers a larger 31.6" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Dell S3225QC or Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has 218 PPI compared to 139 PPI for the Dell S3225QC.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K requires 40cm vs 63cm for the Dell S3225QC to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons