Skip to content

Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" vs Huawei MateView

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"

31.5" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView

28.2" · 3840×2560 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" 2025 Huawei MateView 2021
Screen Size 31.5" (Better) 28.2"
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2560 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 164 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm 53cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 3:2
Refresh Rate 120 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None None
Response Time 5 ms GTG (Better) 8 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 600 DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 450 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 600 nits 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:3,000 (Better) 1:1,200
Ports 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 140 W (Better) 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 93%
Year 2025 (Better) 2021

Summary

The Huawei MateView has higher pixel density (164 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Huawei MateView allows sitting closer (53cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" or Huawei MateView?
The Huawei MateView has 164 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Huawei MateView requires 53cm vs 62cm for the Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons