Skip to content

Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" vs Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"

31.5" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD

27" · 2560×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" 2025 Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD 2024
Screen Size 31.5" (Better) 27"
Resolution 3840×2160 (Better) 2560×1440
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 (Better) 109
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm (Better) 80cm
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 120 Hz (Better) 100 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None None
Response Time 5 ms GTG 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 600 None
SDR Brightness 450 nits (Better) 300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 600 nits 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:3,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP
USB-C Power Delivery 140 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 95%
Year 2025 (Better) 2024

Summary

The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" has higher pixel density (140 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" allows sitting closer (62cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" or Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD?
The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" has 140 PPI compared to 109 PPI for the Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" requires 62cm vs 80cm for the Huawei MateView SE 27 QHD to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons