Skip to content

Huawei MateView GT 27 vs LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Huawei MateView GT 27

27" · 2560×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →

LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

31.5" · 3840×2160 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Huawei MateView GT 27 2022 LG UltraGear 32GS95UE 2024
Screen Size 27" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 109 140 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm 62cm (Better)
Panel Type VA OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 240 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 4 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 350 nits (Better) 275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 600 nits 731 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:4,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 85% sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 88% (Better)
Year 2022 2024 (Better)

Summary

The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE has higher pixel density (140 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE allows sitting closer (62cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Huawei MateView GT 27 or LG UltraGear 32GS95UE?
The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE has 140 PPI compared to 109 PPI for the Huawei MateView GT 27.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The LG UltraGear 32GS95UE requires 62cm vs 80cm for the Huawei MateView GT 27 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons