Skip to content

Huawei MateView GT 27 vs Samsung Odyssey G7 32"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Huawei MateView GT 27

27" · 2560×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung Odyssey G7 32"

31.5" · 2560×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 94cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Huawei MateView GT 27 2022 Samsung Odyssey G7 32" 2020
Screen Size 27" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 2560×1440
Pixel Density (PPI) 109 (Better) 93
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm (Better) 94cm
Panel Type VA VA
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 240 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 4 ms GTG 1 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR 600
SDR Brightness 350 nits 350 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 600 nits 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:4,000 (Better) 1:2,500
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB Hub
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 85% sRGB 125% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 85% (Better)
Year 2022 (Better) 2020

Summary

The Huawei MateView GT 27 has higher pixel density (109 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Huawei MateView GT 27 allows sitting closer (80cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Samsung Odyssey G7 32" offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Huawei MateView GT 27 or Samsung Odyssey G7 32"?
The Huawei MateView GT 27 has 109 PPI compared to 93 PPI for the Samsung Odyssey G7 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Huawei MateView GT 27 requires 80cm vs 94cm for the Samsung Odyssey G7 32" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons