Skip to content

Kuycon P27D vs Kuycon Q32S

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Kuycon P27D

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →

Kuycon Q32S

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Kuycon P27D 2025 Kuycon Q32S 2025
Screen Size 27" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 163 (Better) 140
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm (Better) 62cm
Panel Type IPS QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 240 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC Compatible G-SYNC Compatible
Response Time 5 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 500 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 500 nits 1000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 100 W 100 W
Color Gamut sRGB 99% sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99%
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The Kuycon P27D has higher pixel density (163 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Kuycon P27D allows sitting closer (54cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Kuycon Q32S offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Kuycon P27D or Kuycon Q32S?
The Kuycon P27D has 163 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the Kuycon Q32S.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon P27D requires 54cm vs 62cm for the Kuycon Q32S to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons