Skip to content

Kuycon Q32S vs LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Kuycon Q32S

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45"

44.5" · 5120×2160 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 70cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Kuycon Q32S 2025 LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45" 2025
Screen Size 31.5" 44.5" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2160 5120×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 (Better) 125
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm (Better) 70cm
Panel Type QD-OLED OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 21:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 165 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC Compatible FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 250 nits 275 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1300 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 1:1,500,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 100 W (Better) 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 94%
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The Kuycon Q32S has higher pixel density (140 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Kuycon Q32S allows sitting closer (62cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45" offers a larger 44.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Kuycon Q32S or LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45"?
The Kuycon Q32S has 140 PPI compared to 125 PPI for the LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon Q32S requires 62cm vs 70cm for the LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons