Skip to content

LG 27GP850-B 27" vs LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

LG 27GP850-B 27"

27" · 2560×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →

LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S

31.5" · 6144×3456 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 39cm
Open in calculator →
Specification LG 27GP850-B 27" 2021 LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S 2025
Screen Size 27" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1440 6144×3456 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 109 224 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm 39cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 165 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium None
Response Time 1 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 DisplayHDR 600
SDR Brightness 400 nits 450 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits 600 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:2,000 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 96 W
Color Gamut sRGB 135% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 93% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 99.5%
Year 2021 2025 (Better)

Summary

The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S has higher pixel density (224 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S allows sitting closer (39cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: LG 27GP850-B 27" or LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S?
The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S has 224 PPI compared to 109 PPI for the LG 27GP850-B 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S requires 39cm vs 80cm for the LG 27GP850-B 27" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons