Skip to content

Samsung Odyssey G7 32" vs Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Samsung Odyssey G7 32"

31.5" · 2560×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 94cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Samsung Odyssey G7 32" 2020 Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K 2023
Screen Size 31.5" (Better) 27"
Resolution 2560×1440 5120×2880 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 93 218 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 94cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type VA IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro None
Response Time 1 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 600 None
SDR Brightness 350 nits 600 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 600 nits 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:2,500 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB Hub 0x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 125% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 85% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94%
Year 2020 2023 (Better)

Summary

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Samsung Odyssey G7 32" offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Samsung Odyssey G7 32" or Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has 218 PPI compared to 93 PPI for the Samsung Odyssey G7 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K requires 40cm vs 94cm for the Samsung Odyssey G7 32" to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons