Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover)
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
6.9" · 1440×3120 · AMOLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 18cm
Open in calculator →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover)
6.5" · 1080×2520 · AMOLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 21cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)28in category
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra498 PPI #6
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover)422 PPI #22
368 PPI521 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness28in category
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra2800 nits #15
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover)2600 nits #17
2000 nits4500 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut28in category
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra100% #1
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover)100% #1
100%100%
Refresh Rate
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover)120 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: no visible difference — Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 30cm. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has 18% higher pixel density (498 vs 422 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 18cm.
- Brightness: comparable — Both screens offer similar brightness (700 vs 688 nits SDR). Neither has a meaningful advantage for outdoor use.
Key Differences
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 6.9" | 6.5" |
| Resolution | 1440×3120 | 1080×2520 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 498 | 422 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 18cm | 21cm |
| SDR Brightness | 700 nits | 688 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 2800 nits | 2600 nits |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover) 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 6.9" (Better) | 6.5" |
| Resolution | 1440×3120 (Better) | 1080×2520 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 498 (Better) | 422 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 18cm (Better) | 21cm |
| Panel Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 6:13 | 3:7 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | None |
| Response Time | 1 ms GTG | 1 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | None | None |
| SDR Brightness | 700 nits (Better) | 688 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 2800 nits (Better) | 2600 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 | 1:1,000,000 |
| Ports | USB-C | USB-C |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% |
| Year | 2026 (Better) | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover)?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has 498 PPI compared to 422 PPI for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover).
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra requires 18cm vs 21cm for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover) to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Apple iPhone 16 2024 · 461 PPI · 6.1" · 60 Hz
vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 2026 · 498 PPI · 6.9" · 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 2024 · 461 PPI · 6.1" · 60 Hz
vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover) 2025 · 422 PPI · 6.5" · 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 Plus 2024 · 460 PPI · 6.7" · 60 Hz
vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 2026 · 498 PPI · 6.9" · 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 Plus 2024 · 460 PPI · 6.7" · 60 Hz
vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Cover) 2025 · 422 PPI · 6.5" · 120 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: