Samsung S95F 65" vs TCL QM8 65"
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Advantages of Samsung S95F 65"
| Specification | Samsung S95F 65" | TCL QM8 65" |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.1 ms GTG | 3 ms GTG |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 | 1:5,000 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 99% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 97% · Adobe RGB 90% |
| Year | 2025 | 2024 |
Advantages of TCL QM8 65"
| Specification | Samsung S95F 65" | TCL QM8 65" |
|---|---|---|
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 1364 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 2200 nits | 5000 nits |
Identical
| Specification | Samsung S95F 65" | TCL QM8 65" |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 65" | 65" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 68 | 68 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 1.3m | 1.3m |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | Mini-LED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| HDR Certification | None | None |
| Ports | 4x HDMI · USB-C | 4x HDMI |
Summary
Sharpness: identical
Both screens are retina at 250cm with identical pixel density (68 PPI). No difference in sharpness.
Brightness: advantage TCL QM8 65"
The TCL QM8 65" is 241% brighter in SDR (1364 vs 400 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 5000 vs 2200 nits.
All specifications
| Specification | Samsung S95F 65" 2025 | TCL QM8 65" 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 65" | 65" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 68 | 68 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 1.3m | 1.3m |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | Mini-LED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (Better) | 120 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Response Time | 0.1 ms GTG (Better) | 3 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | None | None |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 1364 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 2200 nits | 5000 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 (Better) | 1:5,000 |
| Ports | 4x HDMI · USB-C | 4x HDMI |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 99% (Better) | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 97% · Adobe RGB 90% |
| Year | 2025 (Better) | 2024 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Samsung S95F 65" or TCL QM8 65"?
Both have 68 PPI.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 1.3m for retina quality.
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated:
Related Comparisons
Hisense U7N 75" 2024 · 59 PPI · 75" · 144 Hz
vs Samsung S95F 65" 2025 · 68 PPI · 65" · 165 Hz
Hisense U7N 75" 2024 · 59 PPI · 75" · 144 Hz
vs TCL QM8 65" 2024 · 68 PPI · 65" · 120 Hz
Hisense U8N 55" 2024 · 80 PPI · 55" · 144 Hz
vs Samsung S95F 65" 2025 · 68 PPI · 65" · 165 Hz
Hisense U8N 55" 2024 · 80 PPI · 55" · 144 Hz
vs TCL QM8 65" 2024 · 68 PPI · 65" · 120 Hz