Skip to content

Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4 vs Framework Laptop 16

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4

14.2" · 3024×1964 · Mini-LED
Optimal Viewing Distance 34cm
Open in calculator →

Framework Laptop 16

16" · 2560×1600 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 46cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4 2024 Framework Laptop 16 2024
Screen Size 14.2" 16" (Better)
Resolution 3024×1964 (Better) 2560×1600
Pixel Density (PPI) 254 (Better) 189
Optimal Viewing Distance 34cm (Better) 46cm
Panel Type Mini-LED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:10 16:10
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None FreeSync
Response Time 3 ms GTG (Better) 9 ms GTG
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 500 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1600 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:1,500
Ports 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C 0x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C
USB-C Power Delivery 96 W 180 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 89% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 97% · Adobe RGB 86%
Year 2024 2024

Summary

The Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4 has higher pixel density (254 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4 allows sitting closer (34cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Framework Laptop 16 offers a larger 16" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4 or Framework Laptop 16?
The Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4 has 254 PPI compared to 189 PPI for the Framework Laptop 16.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Apple MacBook Pro 14" M4 requires 34cm vs 46cm for the Framework Laptop 16 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons