Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10
16" · 2560×1600 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 46cm
Open in calculator →
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition
16" · 3200×2000 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 37cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)18in category
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10189 PPI #16
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition236 PPI #9
189 PPI261 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness18in category
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 101065 nits #6
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition1600 nits #1
500 nits1600 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut17in category
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10100% #1
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition100% #1
97%100%
Refresh Rate
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10240 Hz
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition120 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: no visible difference — Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 50cm. The Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition has 20% higher pixel density (236 vs 189 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 37cm.
- Brightness: advantage Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition — The Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition is 100% brighter in SDR (1000 vs 500 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 1600 vs 1065 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 100 W | 65 W |
| Resolution | 2560×1600 | 3200×2000 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 189 | 236 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 46cm | 37cm |
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1065 nits | 1600 nits |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 94% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 100% |
All specifications
| Specification | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 2025 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 16" | 16" |
| Resolution | 2560×1600 | 3200×2000 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 189 | 236 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 46cm | 37cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | OLED | OLED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz (Better) | 120 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | G-SYNC | None |
| Response Time | 0.2 ms GTG | 0.2 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 1000 | DisplayHDR True Black 1000 |
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1065 nits | 1600 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 | 1:1,000,000 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · USB-C | 1x HDMI · USB-C |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 100 W (Better) | 65 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 94% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 100% (Better) |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 or Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition?
The Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition has 236 PPI compared to 189 PPI for the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition requires 37cm vs 46cm for the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Apple MacBook Air 13" M3 2024 · 225 PPI · 13.6" · 60 Hz
vs Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 2025 · 189 PPI · 16" · 240 Hz
Apple MacBook Air 13" M3 2024 · 225 PPI · 13.6" · 60 Hz
vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition 2025 · 236 PPI · 16" · 120 Hz
Apple MacBook Air 15" M3 2024 · 224 PPI · 15.3" · 60 Hz
vs Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 2025 · 189 PPI · 16" · 240 Hz
Apple MacBook Air 15" M3 2024 · 224 PPI · 15.3" · 60 Hz
vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 10 Aura Edition 2025 · 236 PPI · 16" · 120 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: