Skip to content

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10

16" · 2560×1600 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 46cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16"

16" · 2880×1800 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 41cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 2025 Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" 2025
Screen Size 16" 16"
Resolution 2560×1600 2880×1800 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 189 212 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 46cm 41cm (Better)
Panel Type OLED OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:10 16:10
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 120 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC None
Response Time 0.2 ms GTG (Better) 3 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 1000 DisplayHDR True Black 500
SDR Brightness 500 nits (Better) 390 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1065 nits (Better) 570 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 1:1,000,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C
USB-C Power Delivery 100 W (Better) 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 94% sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better)
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" has higher pixel density (212 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" allows sitting closer (41cm) while maintaining retina quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 or Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16"?
The Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" has 212 PPI compared to 189 PPI for the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16" requires 41cm vs 46cm for the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons