Apple Pro Display XDR 32" vs LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S
31.5" · 6144×3456 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 39cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
Apple Pro Display XDR 32"216 PPI #14
LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S224 PPI #1
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
Apple Pro Display XDR 32"1600 nits #2
LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S600 nits #22
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
Apple Pro Display XDR 32"99% #2
LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S98% #31
79%100%
Refresh Rate
Apple Pro Display XDR 32"60 Hz
LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S60 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 65cm. With nearly identical pixel density (216 vs 224 PPI), there is no visible difference in sharpness.
- Brightness: advantage Apple Pro Display XDR 32" — Similar SDR brightness (500 vs 450 nits), but the Apple Pro Display XDR 32" leads in HDR peak (1600 vs 600 nits).
Key Differences
| Specification | Apple Pro Display XDR 32" | LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 32" | 31.5" |
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1600 nits | 600 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 | 1:2,000 |
| Resolution | 6016×3384 | 6144×3456 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 216 | 224 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 41cm | 39cm |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 99.5% |
| Year | 2019 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 | LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 32" (Better) | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 6016×3384 | 6144×3456 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 216 | 224 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 41cm | 39cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | None |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR 600 |
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits (Better) | 450 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1600 nits (Better) | 600 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 (Better) | 1:2,000 |
| Ports | USB-C · USB Hub | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W | 96 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 99.5% (Better) |
| Year | 2019 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Apple Pro Display XDR 32" or LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S?
The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S has 224 PPI compared to 216 PPI for the Apple Pro Display XDR 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S requires 39cm vs 41cm for the Apple Pro Display XDR 32" to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 · 216 PPI · 32" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S 2025 · 224 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 · 216 PPI · 32" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs LG UltraFine evo 32U990A-S 2025 · 224 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: