ASUS ProArt PA27JCV vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"
31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
ASUS ProArt PA27JCV218 PPI #5
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"140 PPI #30
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
ASUS ProArt PA27JCV500 nits #42
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"1000 nits #7
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
ASUS ProArt PA27JCV99% #2
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
ASUS ProArt PA27JCV60 Hz
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"240 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: no visible difference — Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 65cm. The ASUS ProArt PA27JCV has 56% higher pixel density (218 vs 140 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 40cm.
- Brightness: advantage ASUS ProArt PA27JCV — The ASUS ProArt PA27JCV is 60% brighter in SDR (400 vs 250 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 500 vs 1000 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | ASUS ProArt PA27JCV | MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 5120×2880 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 218 | 140 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 40cm | 62cm |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 250 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W | 90 W |
| Screen Size | 27" | 31.5" |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500 | 1:1,500,000 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% |
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ProArt PA27JCV 2024 | MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 31.5" (Better) |
| Resolution | 5120×2880 (Better) | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 218 (Better) | 140 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 40cm (Better) | 62cm |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 500 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits (Better) | 250 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500 | 1:1,500,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W (Better) | 90 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better) |
| Year | 2024 | 2024 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA27JCV or MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"?
The ASUS ProArt PA27JCV has 218 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The ASUS ProArt PA27JCV requires 40cm vs 62cm for the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ProArt PA27JCV 2024 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ProArt PA27JCV 2024 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: