ASUS ProArt PA32QCV vs Kuycon G32X
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV219 PPI #3
Kuycon G32X219 PPI #3
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV600 nits #22
Kuycon G32X500 nits #42
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV98% #31
Kuycon G32X98% #31
79%100%
Refresh Rate
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV60 Hz
Kuycon G32X60 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 65cm with identical pixel density (219 PPI). No difference in sharpness.
- Brightness: advantage Kuycon G32X — The Kuycon G32X is 25% brighter in SDR (500 vs 400 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 500 vs 600 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | ASUS ProArt PA32QCV | Kuycon G32X |
|---|---|---|
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | 500 nits |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 98% |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W | 100 W |
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ProArt PA32QCV 2025 | Kuycon G32X 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 6016×3384 | 6016×3384 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 219 | 219 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 40cm | 40cm |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 600 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits (Better) | 500 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500 | 1:1,500 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W | 100 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% (Better) | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 98% |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA32QCV or Kuycon G32X?
Both have 219 PPI.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 40cm for retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ProArt PA32QCV 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon G32X 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ProArt PA32QCV 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon G32X 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: