Skip to content

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Dell S3225QC

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5" · 2560×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm
Open in calculator →

Dell S3225QC

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 Dell S3225QC 2025
Screen Size 29.5" 31.6" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1080 3840×2160 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 94 139 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm 63cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS QD-OLED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 220 Hz (Better) 120 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync Premium
Response Time 1 ms GTG 0.0 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR True Black 400
SDR Brightness 300 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 300 nits 1000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,500,000 (Better)
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 15 W 90 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 110% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95%
Year 2022 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Dell S3225QC has higher pixel density (139 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Dell S3225QC allows sitting closer (63cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Dell S3225QC offers a larger 31.6" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Dell S3225QC?
The Dell S3225QC has 139 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Dell S3225QC requires 63cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons